|
Post by neubarth on Jan 7, 2012 18:53:03 GMT -5
Your content, on the other hand, is disgusting. It promotes violence and is hateful/negative in content. That you are a favored child of jdredd is not a surprise - he tends to live in the dark. Remember - you are on a board that, although it welcomes various perspectives, it leans more right than left. Continue your attacks on the Mod and your hateful posts and expect to be asked to leave. We need to correct the criminality in this nation. There is nothing hateful about that. It is frightening to the criminal class that they might actually be put into prison. Do you support those people?
|
|
|
Post by jdredd on Jan 7, 2012 18:53:21 GMT -5
Thanks for the post, Neu. We've needed some well-written and thoughtful posts from the non-far right since dj went on vacation. I'm also glad you titled this thread "Corruption in Government AND Business", since most of the posters simply put all the blame on government, and ignore how business special interests and money drive many or most government policies. I would disagree with putting anyone to death, but I wouldn't mind seeing some outsourcing CEO's spend some time in prison for treason. Nice way to shirk your duties as Moderator by not informing the poster that much of his topic content contained within his threads can get this forum sanctioned. Promoting and condoning violence is not something this forum is about. That we have different views on the duties of a moderator is nothing new, and if the Proboard powers-that-be want to second-guess my decisions to censor or not censor, more power to 'em.
|
|
|
Post by neubarth on Jan 7, 2012 19:14:28 GMT -5
Only a true nutter (whack job) would hold your views or try to associate them with being a Christian. After the disjointed mess that you've been posting I wouldn't try to be too critical of anyone else. The bottom line is that I think you have some serious emotional problems and this board may not be the best place to get the help you need. Well, Jack, it is obvious to me that you can not stand the truth. I write history. I will be writing the history of the satanically inspired and horrendously corrupt Bush administration. The things that happened actually happened. You may not be intelligent enough to be able to read them with understanding, but they are historical fact. For your education, I suggest you Google the issue of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) blocking investigations of Wachovia, Citibank and other big banks in 2005 and 2006. It happened. The corruption was manifest and totally out in the open because the Republiscam Bankers were so openly corrupt. Now, you can try to deny the reality all you want, but history will record the truth. The Bush administration was the most corrupt in American history. Everybody associated with the banking industry in that administration needs to go to jail. I am so sorry if that displeases you, but if you will do the research you will see that it is all very ugly and very true.
|
|
|
Post by dolphie on Jan 7, 2012 20:09:47 GMT -5
Nice way to shirk your duties as Moderator by not informing the poster that much of his topic content contained within his threads can get this forum sanctioned. Promoting and condoning violence is not something this forum is about. That we have different views on the duties of a moderator is nothing new, and if the Proboard powers-that-be want to second-guess my decisions to censor or not censor, more power to 'em. Jdredd, As Moderator - you are to place biases aside. There are rules that Proboards posts that we as sub forums are required to follow. Promoting violence is against their policy. You, as a proboards/sandiegoscene moderator, have an obligation that supercedes your biases - that is to stand by the rules Proboards set forth and the rules of this board. That you prefer to play favorites because someone agrees with your political bent is a sad commentary. Neubarth's posts were not disagreements. They were not just about personal attacks. They were about promoting violence - HUGE DIFFERENCE. Our board, for all the ways that we disagree, we stay peaceful in intentions. We STRONGLY advocate approaching things legally and with our voices. Apparently, you do not agree and as such find it easy to break the common rules in order to play with a fellow lefty. I know without a doubt - as I have seen it occur on this forum - that if one of us righties advocated violence Turk & Jack would have been all over us. Just keep being the hypocritical troll you are, jdredd.
|
|
|
Post by jdredd on Jan 7, 2012 21:36:28 GMT -5
"We are on the edge of a potential civil war that will result in a rewriting of the constitution to put corrupt bankers and their ilk to death."
Is this the line you think is promoting violence? I think it's open to interpretation. Sounds like more of a prediction than promotion to me. The fact that neubarth goes on in another post to defend the death penalty is different than promoting violence, isn't it? I'm sure you support the death penalty. Is that promoting violence? Maybe it is.
But you can second guess my judgement calls all you'd like, knock yourself out.
Jack could have also deleted the offending post.
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Jan 7, 2012 21:38:55 GMT -5
"We are on the edge of a potential civil war that will result in a rewriting of the constitution to put corrupt bankers and their ilk to death." Is this the line you think is promoting violence? I think it's open to interpretation. Sounds like more of a prediction than promotion to me. The fact that neubarth goes on in another post to defend the death penalty is different than promoting violence, isn't it? I'm sure you support the death penalty. Is that promoting violence? Maybe it is. But you can second guess my judgement calls all you'd like, knock yourself out. Jack could have also deleted the offending post. I'd be more than happy to start deleting your posts - just say "when".
|
|
|
Post by jdredd on Jan 7, 2012 21:43:11 GMT -5
"We are on the edge of a potential civil war that will result in a rewriting of the constitution to put corrupt bankers and their ilk to death." Is this the line you think is promoting violence? I think it's open to interpretation. Sounds like more of a prediction than promotion to me. The fact that neubarth goes on in another post to defend the death penalty is different than promoting violence, isn't it? I'm sure you support the death penalty. Is that promoting violence? Maybe it is. But you can second guess my judgement calls all you'd like, knock yourself out. Jack could have also deleted the offending post. I'd be more than happy to start deleting your posts - just say "when". I'm sure you would...
|
|