|
Post by jdredd on Sept 25, 2015 23:36:44 GMT -5
www.al.com/business/index.ssf/2015/09/workers_at_alabama_auto_suppli.html"Employees at a northeastern Alabama auto parts manufacturer have voted in favor of joining the United Auto Workers union. The 89-45 vote was at Commercial Vehicle Group Inc. in Piedmont. A press release posted on the UAW's website cited low pay -- ranging from $9.70 to $15.80 per hour for production workers -- high health care costs and the plant's increasing use of temporary workers as some of the reasons behind the successful union vote. CVG makes seats for commercial trucks. "While we do not believe union representation is in the best interests of the employees, we respect their right to vote on this very important matter," a company statement reads." A rare win in a Guns-and-Jesus state. As Lincoln said, "...You can't fool all of the people all of the time."
|
|
|
Post by jdredd on Jan 9, 2016 14:54:21 GMT -5
www.nytimes.com/2016/01/10/business/doctors-unionize-to-resist-the-medical-machine.html?_r=0"It was the idea that they could end up seeing more patients that prompted outrage among the hospitalists at Sacred Heart, which has two facilities in the area, with a total of nearly 450 beds. “We’re doctors, we’re professionals,” Dr. Alexander said. “Giving me a bonus for seeing two more patients — I’m not sure I should be doing that. It’s not safe.” (A hospital representative said patient safety was “inviolate.”)
Some Sacred Heart hospitalists left for other jobs, and the rest formed a union, one of the first of its kind in the country.To everyone’s surprise, Sacred Heart’s administration agreed to junk its outsourcing plan, but this retreat did not usher in a love fest. Instead, there has been a long, grinding negotiation with the administration over the proper role of the hospital doctor, which continues to this day. Dr. Alexander and his colleagues say they are in favor of efficiency gains. It’s the particular way the hospital has interpreted this mandate that has left them feeling demoralized. If you talk to them for long enough, you get the distinct feeling it is not just their jobs that hang in the balance, but the loss of something much less tangible — the ability of doctors everywhere to exercise their professional judgment." Despite all the anti-Union propaganda in the American press, some workers still feel the need to organize in the face of management manipulation in the name of "efficiency".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2016 17:48:08 GMT -5
And now the news where Hateful person News network Report real Facts That liberal Media don't! As Usual the Union Thugs is running rampant extorting Money from workers Just like their Mafia masters! Hopefully Right to work Foundation will stamp out Unions greed and harassment of workers! Unions extortion and Harassment
|
|
|
Post by jdredd on Jan 11, 2016 1:37:41 GMT -5
And now the news where Hateful person News network Report real Facts That liberal Media don't! As Usual the Union Thugs is running rampant extorting Money from workers Just like their Mafia masters! Hopefully Right to work Foundation will stamp out Unions greed and harassment of workers! Unions extortion and HarassmentUnions will outlive this corrupt Supreme Court, so let the court do it's worst. Just another battle in a war that never ends.
|
|
|
Post by jdredd on Mar 30, 2016 2:47:10 GMT -5
www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-unions-idUSKCN0WV1PG "Public sector unions triumphed before the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday when the justices preserved a vital source of cash for organized labor, splitting 4-4 on a conservative challenge that had seemed destined for success until Justice Antonin Scalia's death last month. The case brought by non-union public school teachers in California had targeted fees that many states force such workers to pay unions in lieu of dues to fund collective bargaining and other activities. A loss in this case would have deprived unions representing teachers, police, transit workers, firefighters and other government employees of millions of dollars annually and diminished their political clout. The outcome illustrated the impact on the court of the Feb. 13 death of Scalia, the long-serving conservative justice who almost certainly would have cast a decisive vote against the unions. But by virtue of splitting 4-4, the justices affirmed a 2014 lower-court ruling that allowed California to compel non-union workers to pay the fees." Har-har! Anti-Unions righties thought they had this one in the bag until Scumlia dropped dead last month. I was more right than I knew when I said in my previous post "Unions will outlive this corrupt Supreme Court"!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2016 17:40:43 GMT -5
www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-unions-idUSKCN0WV1PG "Public sector unions triumphed before the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday when the justices preserved a vital source of cash for organized labor, splitting 4-4 on a conservative challenge that had seemed destined for success until Justice Antonin Scalia's death last month. The case brought by non-union public school teachers in California had targeted fees that many states force such workers to pay unions in lieu of dues to fund collective bargaining and other activities. A loss in this case would have deprived unions representing teachers, police, transit workers, firefighters and other government employees of millions of dollars annually and diminished their political clout. The outcome illustrated the impact on the court of the Feb. 13 death of Scalia, the long-serving conservative justice who almost certainly would have cast a decisive vote against the unions. But by virtue of splitting 4-4, the justices affirmed a 2014 lower-court ruling that allowed California to compel non-union workers to pay the fees." Har-har! Anti-Unions righties thought they had this one in the bag until Scumlia dropped dead last month. I was more right than I knew when I said in my previous post "Unions will outlive this corrupt Supreme Court"! And the Mafia Unions will go down in flames! and the Workers got screwed the Extortion continues! liberals will pay! Time to bash the Union thugs skulls!
|
|
|
Post by jdredd on Mar 30, 2016 18:35:39 GMT -5
www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-unions-idUSKCN0WV1PG "Public sector unions triumphed before the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday when the justices preserved a vital source of cash for organized labor, splitting 4-4 on a conservative challenge that had seemed destined for success until Justice Antonin Scalia's death last month. The case brought by non-union public school teachers in California had targeted fees that many states force such workers to pay unions in lieu of dues to fund collective bargaining and other activities. A loss in this case would have deprived unions representing teachers, police, transit workers, firefighters and other government employees of millions of dollars annually and diminished their political clout. The outcome illustrated the impact on the court of the Feb. 13 death of Scalia, the long-serving conservative justice who almost certainly would have cast a decisive vote against the unions. But by virtue of splitting 4-4, the justices affirmed a 2014 lower-court ruling that allowed California to compel non-union workers to pay the fees." Har-har! Anti-Unions righties thought they had this one in the bag until Scumlia dropped dead last month. I was more right than I knew when I said in my previous post "Unions will outlive this corrupt Supreme Court"! And the Mafia Unions will go down in flames! and the Workers got screwed the Extortion continues! liberals will pay! Time to bash the Union thugs skulls! Ha-ha! U wish!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2016 8:49:35 GMT -5
And the Mafia Unions will go down in flames! and the Workers got screwed the Extortion continues! liberals will pay! Time to bash the Union thugs skulls! Ha-ha! U wish! Nope A reality! Union thugs are Cowards uses kids as shield! Antonin Scalia' A regular American wants to put an end of Union harassment on workers, and extortion! We all know you supported Unions Crimes harassing people Committing Murders and all the Illegal activity! I hope these thugs come to my town try to cause a riot I will counter protest I want these thugs try to kick the crap out of me But I will be doing a ass stomping, I will beat them until they are out cold nighty night, I will post pics on this site use their bloody beaten body and write on their backs with their blood message goes Jredds approved Union Thugs! You can't handle the fact of Union thugs crimes Just like all liberals you can't handle the Truth! I posted many facts! But your liberal media masters told you it's a lie! If Trump does becomes the new Prez. It will be the end of the Unions He will sign Right to work Laws! But we know elections will be fixed by liberals and Repukes! This is the promise I will keep IF only IF union thugs try to cause trouble in my town I want them to try to assault me first! then by my Legal right I can Defend myself in self defense, as long I go my friends as witness, cops cant do squat! Legally counter protesting they jumped me and I fought back and beat them senseless I will post their bloody beaten body with message Jredds approved thugs!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2016 9:25:54 GMT -5
Truth Jredd can't handle! Too much liberal crack media can kill brain cells! Fact #1Fact #2 Fact #3Fact #4Fact #5Fact #6With all the Facts I posted liberal Media will never Report it! Obama appointing Union Labor Thugs at Dept of Labor! Workers getting screwed! The truth Wins Jd lost! Try Again! you can't win!
|
|
|
Post by jdredd on Mar 31, 2016 15:03:43 GMT -5
This is my favorite, "Fact" #6:The raging union-led protests in Wisconsin have resulted in many Americans taking a closer, more critical look at labor unions and their political clout and influence in shaping policy. With the ubiquitous announcement from AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka that he is granted an audience at the White House “nearly every day,” the American people have become more skeptical of unions and the role that they play in the political process. Spawning this renewed attention to organized labor are reports that Democratic politicians have been endorsing violence as a legitimate means of protest and political expression. Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Mass.) has gone as far as telling a crowd of protesters at a union rally that they should be unafraid to “get out on the streets and get a little bloody when necessary,” and several other protesters took Capuano’s advice to heart, as former Tea Party Republican congressional candidate Marty Lamb, who ran against Democrat Rep. Jim McGovern in the 2010 elections, was reportedly brutally pummeled to the ground by union operatives at the same rally where Capuano issued his charge to violence. However, the events that are unfolding now across the country must be placed within the context of organized labor’s broader history of violence and its historical embrace of brutal physical force as a means of legitimate political expression (which crosses the line into what is commonly defined as terrorism). The violence surrounding the various labor uprisings across America is part of a broader culture of bloodlust and savage turbulence within organized labor that has marred the movement since its inception in the late 19th century. It has clear roots in violent, anarcho-communist ideology that lacks any regard for natural rights of life, liberty, and private property — and it threatens the very foundations of our constitutional republic." I love this because it plainly states the far right's view on workers organizing: it is "anarcho-communism"! And as for violence, when is violence justified? Certainly most Americans think violence is justified against ISIS. And policemen believe violence is justified against citizens they think are threatening them, real or imagined. It's all spin.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2016 17:09:11 GMT -5
This is my favorite, "Fact" #6:The raging union-led protests in Wisconsin have resulted in many Americans taking a closer, more critical look at labor unions and their political clout and influence in shaping policy. With the ubiquitous announcement from AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka that he is granted an audience at the White House “nearly every day,” the American people have become more skeptical of unions and the role that they play in the political process. Spawning this renewed attention to organized labor are reports that Democratic politicians have been endorsing violence as a legitimate means of protest and political expression. Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Mass.) has gone as far as telling a crowd of protesters at a union rally that they should be unafraid to “get out on the streets and get a little bloody when necessary,” and several other protesters took Capuano’s advice to heart, as former Tea Party Republican congressional candidate Marty Lamb, who ran against Democrat Rep. Jim McGovern in the 2010 elections, was reportedly brutally pummeled to the ground by union operatives at the same rally where Capuano issued his charge to violence. However, the events that are unfolding now across the country must be placed within the context of organized labor’s broader history of violence and its historical embrace of brutal physical force as a means of legitimate political expression (which crosses the line into what is commonly defined as terrorism). The violence surrounding the various labor uprisings across America is part of a broader culture of bloodlust and savage turbulence within organized labor that has marred the movement since its inception in the late 19th century. It has clear roots in violent, anarcho-communist ideology that lacks any regard for natural rights of life, liberty, and private property — and it threatens the very foundations of our constitutional republic." I love this because it plainly states the far right's view on workers organizing: it is "anarcho-communism"! And as for violence, when is violence justified? Certainly most Americans think violence is justified against ISIS. And policemen believe violence is justified against citizens they think are threatening them, real or imagined. It's all spin. I see Crack had killed your brain cells! The truth hurts you! you better stay in your liberal La La land soon your unicorns fairies will remove their masks and you see the ugly truth in liberal la la land! a cockroach stuck in the glue trap! Again You Lost! Thanks for playing It shows liberals are the biggest losers, Truth and Facts liberals cant handle!
|
|
|
Post by jdredd on Mar 31, 2016 18:57:00 GMT -5
Sorry, there is no "winning" or "losing" here. We argue, they decide.
|
|
|
Post by jdredd on Apr 8, 2016 18:08:27 GMT -5
www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/04/08/court-strikes-down-wisconsin-right-to-work-law.html?intcmp=hplnws"Wisconsin's right-to-work law, championed by Republican Gov. Scott Walker as he was mounting his run for president, was struck down Friday as violating the state constitution. Attorney General Brad Schimel, also a Republican, promised to appeal the decision and said he was confident it would not stand, noting that no similar law has been struck down in any other state. Schimel has not decided whether to seek an immediate suspension of the ruling while the appeal is pending, spokesman Johnny Koremenos said. "We are confident Wisconsin's freedom-to-work law is constitutional and will ultimately be upheld," Walker wrote on Twitter." One small defeat for the "right-to-work" dirtbags. Better than nothing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2016 17:27:11 GMT -5
www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/04/08/court-strikes-down-wisconsin-right-to-work-law.html?intcmp=hplnws"Wisconsin's right-to-work law, championed by Republican Gov. Scott Walker as he was mounting his run for president, was struck down Friday as violating the state constitution. Attorney General Brad Schimel, also a Republican, promised to appeal the decision and said he was confident it would not stand, noting that no similar law has been struck down in any other state. Schimel has not decided whether to seek an immediate suspension of the ruling while the appeal is pending, spokesman Johnny Koremenos said. "We are confident Wisconsin's freedom-to-work law is constitutional and will ultimately be upheld," Walker wrote on Twitter." One small defeat for the "right-to-work" dirtbags. Better than nothing. Commie thieving Union Thugs Will never win, Stealing workers money, Workers have no say in this matter! Dream on! small defeat will not be upheld for long! liberals pukes believe its okay to hold public and private businesses hostage, They want to force people to pay I mean STEAL workers money from their pay check, owners want the well qualified person to work for them, has good work ethic records, and the good worker does not want to join and pay extortion dues, The owner can't do nothing about it The Union slugs won't let the owner hire him. so it undermines the owners Authority so its the owners company he or she has the right to hire or fire But the Scum Unions took away the owner Authority! Owners can't fire Lazy Union workers. Workers get screwed by thieving Unions, members or non unions members! In the nut shell Owners no longer run the company The Unions Runs the company stolen by the Unions, Owners cant do nothing about it! So in JDs Little Mind He supports Unions extortion's Pay to work, (Why people should pay to work and forced to join?) He favors Unions screwing members workers have no say how dues are spent. JD also Favors Unions thugs attacking, killing, Threatening Owners non members and Members, When unions gets mad they don't get what they want! Should I go on with more truthful Facts?? Of course JD cant handle it! Also JD appraised Unions getting away with the crimes they committed.
|
|
|
Post by jdredd on Apr 9, 2016 18:04:06 GMT -5
Ha-ha! My "little mind" looks at it different. I understand completely workers who want the bennies of working in a Union shop and still being able to get away with not kicking in their share of dues. As I say, conservatism is a character flaw. And just because you hire workers does not mean they are your slaves, your "Authority" only goes so far. If your workers want to organize, tough s**t for you. Maybe if you hadn't treated them like s**t they wouldn't feel the need. As for Union members being "thugs", it's all spin. Owners have always had dirty cops to act as their thugs, when they aren't hiring private "security firms" to do their dirty work. Read your history, amigo. Union organizers are still being murdered all over the world.
|
|